On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:19 -0400, Phil Turmel wrote:

I think you should read Neil's blog entry

I did ;)

before you get too excited
about raid6check.

Sure it's not a magic wand for all situations... and raid6check itself
seems to be rather at a early starting point...

You can only trust its decisions when you are
confident that the problems it finds are *only* due to silent read
errors.

Sure.... but at least it can be misused as kinda poor-man's integrity
check.

AFAIU it's not yet working, that it can tell you back through the fs,
which file is affected?


Cheers,
Chris.