Am 24.02.2013 19:33, schrieb Phil Turmel:

On 02/24/2013 01:22 PM, Stone wrote:

quoted

Am 24.02.2013 15:15, schrieb Phil Turmel:

quoted

On 02/24/2013 02:10 AM, Stone wrote:

quoted

e2fsck: aborted

the output have 711mb..
do you ned more examples?
what do you say to case1?

I think you need to see case2.  Case #1 isn't very good.

Case #2 ....

quoted

same shit different partion.
the logfile have 708mb
:(

Hmm.  If one was clearly better than the other, I'd recommend you do
"fsck -y" with it.  But they are both ugly.  Not extraordinarily bad,
but bad.

I believe you should copy all three complete drives to spares, then try
"fsck -y" with case #1.  If it doesn't give you your data, put the
spares in your system and try case #2 with "fsck -y".

If neither case #1 nor case #2 give you (most of) your data, I'm out of
ideas. :-(

Phil

hm ok.
what copy method recommend you?
dd? (the duration is very long)

i think i must buy disks because if i get a pice of my data back than i 
copy it to my secound storage and so many space i dont have...

if this is you last idea then i will try this.