Re: Brocken Raid & LUKS
From: Stone <hidden>
Date: 2013-02-20 18:32:34
Am 20.02.2013 01:31, schrieb Phil Turmel:
You forgot to include linux-raid again. I'm adding them back to the CC:. Please always use "reply to all" in your email client.
Sorry.
I will look for your detailed reply tomorrow. Phil On 02/19/2013 05:23 PM, Stone wrote:quoted
Am 19.02.2013 23:08, schrieb Phil Turmel:quoted
On 02/19/2013 04:31 PM, Stone wrote: [trim /]quoted
quoted
[trim /]ok. my system is a ubuntu 12.04 i can install a older mdadm or a install a old ubuntu like 11.04. there is a older mdadm on board.Using the older ubuntu as a LiveCD should be fine--you don't have to uninistall your current system. [trim /]quoted
ok. here my next steps i find a older mdadm or i install a older ubunt with an older mdadm on board. then i stop my md2 device and recreate it with: mdadm --create /dev/md2 --assume-clean --verbose --level=5 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 missing /dev/sdf1Yes. But read all the way through first....quoted
with a little bit of hope i can open the device.But *don't* mount it! Use "fsck -n" after you open it to verify it is Ok. If you mount it, and the chunk size is wrong, it will damage your encrypted filesystem.quoted
if not. i stop the md2 and recreate it with? with the parameter chunk? and with what value? do you have a range for me?The current default is 512. The old default was 64. I'd try that if 512 doesn't work. After that you'll have to guess.Ok i will test this tomorrow.quoted
quoted
here the timeout infos: for x in /sys/block/sd*/device/timeout ; do echo $x ; cat $x ; done /sys/block/sda/device/timeout 30 /sys/block/sdb/device/timeout 30 /sys/block/sdc/device/timeout 30 /sys/block/sdd/device/timeout 30 /sys/block/sde/device/timeout 30 /sys/block/sdf/device/timeout 30Ok, these are all Linux default. 30 seconds.quoted
here the smart infos:Uh oh. Two serious issues:quoted
smartctl -x /dev/sdc1 smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [x86_64-linux-3.2.0-23-generic] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net[trim /]quoted
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct PO--CK 200 200 140 - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate -OSR-K 200 200 000 - 0 9 Power_On_Hours -O--CK 078 078 000 - 16219 10 Spin_Retry_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count -O--CK 100 253 000 - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 84 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count -O--CK 200 200 000 - 82 193 Load_Cycle_Count -O--CK 169 169 000 - 94419 194 Temperature_Celsius -O---K 114 106 000 - 36 196 Reallocated_Event_Count -O--CK 200 200 000 - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector -O--CK 200 200 000 - 2Serious issue #1: You have unreadable sectors on sdc. When you hit them during rebuild, sdc will be kicked out (again). They might not be permanent errors, but you can't tell until the drive is given fresh data to write over them. You have two choices: 1) use ddrescue to copy sdc onto a new drive, then use it in place of sdc when you re-create the array, or 2) use badblocks to find the exact locations of the bad sectors, then write zeros to those sectors using dd. Either way, you have lost whatever those sectors used to hold.
befor i will recreate the raid with an older mdadm i would search the badblocks. is this right? i have check all drives and the sdc device had badblock: Pass completed, 48 bad blocks found. (48/0/0 errors) but die binary dont give me the info where they are.. i have used this command in a screen badblocks -v /dev/sdc1
quoted
quoted
[trim /]yes this cheep WD Green drives. i have 4 new better drives here the i will use instead. this means i will get the raid running and than i copy all the data on the new drives.quoted
quoted
SCT Status Version: 3 SCT Version (vendor specific): 258 (0x0102) SCT Support Level: 1 Device State: Active (0) Current Temperature: 36 Celsius Power Cycle Min/Max Temperature: 33/37 Celsius Lifetime Min/Max Temperature: 33/44 Celsius Under/Over Temperature Limit Count: 0/0 SCT Temperature History Version: 2 Temperature Sampling Period: 1 minute Temperature Logging Interval: 1 minute Min/Max recommended Temperature: 0/60 Celsius Min/Max Temperature Limit: -41/85 Celsius Temperature History Size (Index): 478 (314) Index Estimated Time Temperature Celsius 315 2013-02-19 14:26 36 ***************** ... ..(476 skipped). .. ***************** 314 2013-02-19 22:23 36 ***************** Warning: device does not support SCT Error Recovery Control commandSerious issue #2: Error timeout mismatch. Your cheap drives do not support Error Recovery Control. That means when they run into unreadable sectors, they will spend a couple minutes trying "extra hard" to get the data. But linux is only going to wait 30 seconds. Then it will reset the SATA link and try again. But the drive will *not* give up its error recovery effort, and will not even *talk* to the linux driver in the meantime, so the linux driver will disconnect the drive and report errors for all remaining requests. This will cause MD to kick the drive out. You only have one choice: 1) Set a long timeout in the linux drivers for the drives in your array, on every boot. Something like: for x in /sys/block/sd[cdef]/device/timeout ; do echo 180 >$x ; done If you had slightly better drives, SCTERC would be supported. On desktop drives at power up, it is disabled. But you would be able to enable a normal 7.0 second timeout in the drives using smartctl. (In a script, on every boot up.) Enterprise "raid" drives do this by default. [trim /]quoted
smartctl -x /dev/sdd1 smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [x86_64-linux-3.2.0-23-generic] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net[trim /]quoted
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-K 200 200 051 - 534 3 Spin_Up_Time POS--K 172 171 021 - 6383 4 Start_Stop_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 586 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct PO--CK 200 200 140 - 2You already have two relocations on this drive.quoted
7 Seek_Error_Rate -OSR-K 100 253 000 - 0 9 Power_On_Hours -O--CK 085 085 000 - 11487In less than two years. You should pay close attention to this. Phili think i must learn to interpret the smart values better. thank you. i will send you tomorrow my new info with the older mdadm version.