On 02/05/2013 08:49 AM, Brian Candler wrote:

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:40:14PM +0000, Brian Candler wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:02:37PM +0000, Robin Hill wrote:

quoted

quoted

1. The UUUU_ and [22/21] suggests that one disk is bad, but is that true?
And if so which one?

No, that's normal. A RAID5 (or RAID6) array is created in a degraded
form, then the last disk(s) are recovered (it's the quickest way of
getting the array ready for use).

Ah I see. Thank you.

The odd thing is, if I make a RAID6 I get [UUUUU] with no underscores?

# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] 
md127 : active raid6 sdy[23](S) sdx[22] sdw[21] sdv[20] sdu[19] sdt[18] sds[17] sdr[16] sdq[15] sdp[14] sdo[13] sdn[12] sdm[11] sdl[10] sdk[9] sdj[8] sdi[7] sdh[6] sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0]
      61532835840 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [23/23] [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU]
      [>....................]  resync =  0.0% (850232/2930135040) finish=1607.7min speed=30365K/sec
      bitmap: 22/22 pages [88KB], 65536KB chunk

Raid6 resyncs to get started where raid5 rebuilds to get started.

Regular parity is computationally identical to create from the data and
to compute one data from the parity and the rest.  So reading linearly
from all drives but one, and writing linearly to just one is the fastest
way to start raid5.

The Q syndrome in raid6 is not symmetrical.  It is more expensive to
compute data from Q, so raid6 doesn't try to do that on creation.

Phil