Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2012-11-20

Re: [PATCH] raid5: panic() on dma_wait_for_async_tx() error

From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-19 05:22:39
Also in: lkml


On 11/18/12 5:06 PM, "NeilBrown" [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you comment on this please?  Would it make sense to arrange for
errors
to propagate up?  Or should we arrange to do a software-fallback in the
dma
engine is a problem?  What sort of things can cause error here anyway?
Propagating up is missing reliable "dma abort" operation.

In these cases the engine failed to complete due to hardware hang / driver
bug, or has hit a memory error (uncorrectable even with software
fallback).  This originally should have been using async_tx_quiesce()
which also does the panic.

The engines that I have worked with have either lacked support for
aborting, or were otherwise unable to recover from a hardware hang.
However, for engines that do support error recovery they should be able to
hide the failure from the upper layers.

--
Dan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help