Thread (66 messages) 66 messages, 11 authors, 2010-09-18

Re: [PATCH 23/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-09-13 19:01:38
Also in: dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-ide, linux-scsi, lkml


On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
On 09/10/2010 10:06 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
quoted
But I have my work rules that I learned: I use no git kernels and no 
external patches (except Alasdair's patchset that I want to test). I only 
use -rc or final kernels. I need a stable computer --- I don't want to 
solve problems like "does it crash because I pulled something or does it 
crash because I made a bug in my code?" So, put that into 2.6.37-rc1 and 
I'll optimize flushes in dm for -rc2 or -rc3.
Alright, I'm sorry but this is as far as I would go for dm conversion
patches.  If you wanna split it further or do it your way, please feel
free to.  I think it would be beneficial to do things now but, hey,
you guys are maintaining dm part of the kernel, so it's up to you
guys.  But, I think it would be silly for everyone else to wait for
the rather special requirement for dm, so if we have to go forward
without dm updates, I suppose we will have to.  Jens, please feel free
to drop dm conversion patches.

Thanks.
-- 
tejun
I think: take the first patch and submit it on your own, and send the rest 
of patches to Alasdair to his tree. If I get such big patches I am unable 
to immediatelly say if they are correct or not.

Mikulas
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help