Thread (66 messages) 66 messages, 11 authors, 2010-09-18

Re: [PATCH 23/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm

From: Ric Wheeler <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-11 12:19:33
Also in: dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-ide, linux-scsi, lkml

  On 09/10/2010 07:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On 09/10/2010 10:06 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
quoted
But I have my work rules that I learned: I use no git kernels and no
external patches (except Alasdair's patchset that I want to test). I only
use -rc or final kernels. I need a stable computer --- I don't want to
solve problems like "does it crash because I pulled something or does it
crash because I made a bug in my code?" So, put that into 2.6.37-rc1 and
I'll optimize flushes in dm for -rc2 or -rc3.
Alright, I'm sorry but this is as far as I would go for dm conversion
patches.  If you wanna split it further or do it your way, please feel
free to.  I think it would be beneficial to do things now but, hey,
you guys are maintaining dm part of the kernel, so it's up to you
guys.  But, I think it would be silly for everyone else to wait for
the rather special requirement for dm, so if we have to go forward
without dm updates, I suppose we will have to.  Jens, please feel free
to drop dm conversion patches.

Thanks.
I think that we certainly want to continue to fix the whole path - including dm 
- so we do not end up with the fragmented set of works here/doesn't work there 
situation we had for several years. If Mikulas has better patches, he should 
post them for review.

Thanks!

Ric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help