Neil Brown wrote:

I certainly accept that the documentation is probably less that
perfect (by a large margin).  I am more than happy to accept patches
or concrete suggestions on how to improve that.  I always think it is
best if a non-developer writes documentation (and a developer reviews
it) as then it is more likely to address the issues that a
non-developer will want to read about, and in a way that will make
sense to a non-developer. (i.e. I'm to close to the subject to write
good doco).

Patches against what's in 2.6.4 I assume? I can't promise to write 
anything which pleases even me, but I will take a look at it.

-- 
bill davidsen [off-list ref]
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979