Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 9 authors, 2007-10-11

Re: RAID 5 performance issue.

From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-05 16:16:07


On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Andrew Clayton wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:07:47 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:
quoted
Yikes, yeah I would get them off the PCI card, what kind of
motherboard is it?  If you don't have a PCI-e based board it probably
won't help THAT much but it still should be better than placing 3
drives on a PCI card.
Moved the drives back onto the on board controller.

While I had the machine down I ran memtest86+ for about 5 mins, no
errors.

I also got the output of mkfs.xfs -f -N /dev/md0

meta-data=/dev/md0               isize=256    agcount=16, agsize=7631168 blks
        =                       sectsz=4096  attr=0
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=122097920, imaxpct=25
        =                       sunit=64     swidth=128 blks, unwritten=1
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
        =                       sectsz=4096  sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none                   extsz=524288 blocks=0, rtextents=0
quoted
Justin.
Thanks for your help by the way.

Andrew
Hm, unfortunately at this point I think I am out of ideas you may need to 
ask the XFS/linux-raid developers how to run blktrace during those 
operations to figure out what is going on.

BTW: Last thing I can think of, did you make any changes to PREEMPTION in 
the kernel, or do you disable it (SERVER)?

Justin.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help