Re: RAID 5 performance issue.
From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-05 10:20:55
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Andrew Clayton wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:46:05 -0400, Steve Cousins wrote:quoted
Andrew Clayton wrote:quoted
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:39:09 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote: >> What type (make/model) of the drives?quoted
>The drives are 250GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K250 series ATA-6 UDMA/100 A couple of things:1. I thought you had SATA drives 2. ATA-6 would be UDMA/133 The SATA-1 versions of the 7K250's did not have NCQ. The SATA-2 versions do have NCQ. If you do have SATA drives, are they SATA-1 or SATA-2?Not sure, I suspect SATA 1 seeing as we've had them nearly 3 years. Some bits from dmesg ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xffffc20000aa4880 ctl 0xffffc20000aa488a bmdma 0xff ffc20000aa4800 irq 19 ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310) ata1.00: ATA-6: HDS722525VLSA80, V36OA63A, max UDMA/100 ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100quoted
SteveAndrew - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Looks like SATA1 (non-ncq) to me. Justin.