Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 6 authors, 2021-07-01

Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM: domain: use per-genpd lockdep class

From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-15 15:35:42
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 17:26, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 04:55:24PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:17:20PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Beyond this, perhaps we should consider removing the
"regulator-fixed-domain" DT property, as to avoid similar problems
from cropping up?
quoted
quoted
quoted
Mark, what do you think?
quoted
quoted
We need to maintain compatibility for existing users...
quoted
Normally, yes, I would agree.
quoted
In this case, it looks like there is only one user, which is somewhat
broken in regards to this, so what's the point of keeping this around?
Only one user in mainline and you were just suggesting removing the
property (you mean binding I think?) - at the very least we'd need to
transition that upstream user away to something else before doing
anything.
Yes, I am referring to the binding.

Let's see where we end up with this. My concern at this point is that
it could spread to more users, which would make it even more difficult
to remove.

Kind regards
Uffe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help