On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:47:36 +0100
Quentin Schulz [off-list ref] wrote:
!!'s behaviour isn't that obvious and sparse complained about it, so
let's replace it with a ternary condition.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <redacted>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
index a30a972..7a745cf 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int axp20x_adc_offset_voltage(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel,
return -EINVAL;
}
- *val = !!(*val) * 700000;
+ *val = *val ? 700000 : 0;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
}
@@ -442,15 +442,17 @@ static int axp20x_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
if (val != 0 && val != 700000)
return -EINVAL;
+ val = val ? 1 : 0;
+
switch (chan->channel) {
case AXP20X_GPIO0_V:
reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0;
- regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(!!val);
+ regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(val);
break;
case AXP20X_GPIO1_V:
reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1;
- regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(!!val);
+ regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(val);
break;
default: