Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] power: bq27xxx_battery: Add power_supply_battery_info support
From: Andrew F. Davis <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-28 11:48:35
On 02/27/2017 02:05 PM, Liam Breck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Andrew F. Davis [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 02/27/2017 01:11 AM, Liam Breck wrote:quoted
From: Liam Breck <redacted> Previously there was no way to configure chip registers in the event that the defaults didn't match the battery in question. BQ27xxx driver now calls power_supply_get_battery_info, checks the inputs, and writes battery data to chip RAM or non-volatile memory. Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <redacted> Signed-off-by: Liam Breck <redacted> --- drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c | 458 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 456 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c index 7475a5f..41d4ce7 100644 --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ #include <linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h> -#define DRIVER_VERSION "1.2.0" +#define DRIVER_VERSION "1.3.0" #define BQ27XXX_MANUFACTURER "Texas Instruments"@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_DSC BIT(0) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_SOCF BIT(1) /* State-of-Charge threshold final */ #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_SOC1 BIT(2) /* State-of-Charge threshold 1 */ +#define BQ27XXX_FLAG_CFGUP BIT(5) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_FC BIT(9) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD BIT(14) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC BIT(15)@@ -72,6 +73,11 @@ #define BQ27000_FLAG_FC BIT(5) #define BQ27000_FLAG_CHGS BIT(7) /* Charge state flag */ +/* control register params */ +#define BQ27XXX_SEALED 0x20 +#define BQ27XXX_SET_CFGUPDATE 0x13 +#define BQ27XXX_SOFT_RESET 0x42 + #define BQ27XXX_RS (20) /* Resistor sense mOhm */ #define BQ27XXX_POWER_CONSTANT (29200) /* 29.2 µV^2 * 1000 */ #define BQ27XXX_CURRENT_CONSTANT (3570) /* 3.57 µV * 1000 */@@ -102,6 +108,11 @@ enum bq27xxx_reg_index { BQ27XXX_REG_SOC, /* State-of-Charge */ BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP, /* Design Capacity */ BQ27XXX_REG_AP, /* Average Power */ + BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL, /* BlockDataControl() *//* Block Data Control */quoted
+ BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS, /* DataClass() *//* Data Class */I used the terms from the docs, so a search will find meaningful results.quoted
quoted
+ BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK, /* DataBlock() */ + BQ27XXX_DM_DATA, /* BlockData() */ + BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM, /* BlockDataChecksum() */ BQ27XXX_REG_MAX, /* sentinel */ };@@ -125,6 +136,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x0b, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x76, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, }, [BQ27010] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -144,6 +160,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x0b, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x76, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, }, [BQ27500] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -163,6 +184,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27510] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -182,6 +208,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x20, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x2e, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27530] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -201,6 +232,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27541] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -220,6 +256,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27545] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -239,6 +280,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27421] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -258,6 +304,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x1c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x18, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27425] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -277,6 +328,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x1c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x18, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60,That wasn't so painful was it :)It added 11% to the patch :-/quoted
quoted
}, };@@ -452,6 +508,81 @@ static struct { static DEFINE_MUTEX(bq27xxx_list_lock); static LIST_HEAD(bq27xxx_battery_devices); +#define BQ27XXX_DM_SZ 32 + +#define BQ27XXX_MSLEEP(i) usleep_range((i)*1000, (i)*1000+500) + +struct bq27xxx_dm_reg { + u8 subclass_id; + u8 offset; + u8 bytes; + u16 min, max; +}; + +struct bq27xxx_dm_buf { + u8 class; + u8 block; + u8 a[BQ27XXX_DM_SZ]; + bool full, updt; +}; + +#define BQ27XXX_DM_BUF(di, i) { \ + .class = bq27xxx_dm_regs[(di)->chip][i].subclass_id, \ + .block = bq27xxx_dm_regs[(di)->chip][i].offset / BQ27XXX_DM_SZ, \ +} + +static inline u16* bq27xxx_dm_buf_ptr(struct bq27xxx_dm_buf *buf, + struct bq27xxx_dm_reg *reg) { + if (buf->class == reg->subclass_id + && buf->block == reg->offset / BQ27XXX_DM_SZ) + return (u16*) (buf->a + reg->offset % BQ27XXX_DM_SZ); + + return NULL; +} + +enum bq27xxx_dm_reg_id { + BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY = 0, + BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY, + BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE, +}; + +static const char* bq27xxx_dm_reg_name[] = { + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = "design-capacity", + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = "design-energy", + [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = "terminate-voltage", +}; + +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27425_dm_regs[] = { + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = { 82, 12, 2, 0, 32767 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = { 82, 14, 2, 0, 32767 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 18, 2, 2800, 3700 }, +}; + +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27421_dm_regs[] = { /* not tested */ + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = { 82, 10, 2, 0, 8000 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = { 82, 12, 2, 0, 32767 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 16, 2, 2500, 3700 }, +}; + +//static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27621_dm_regs[] = { /* not tested */ +// [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = { 82, 3, 2, 0, 8000 }, +// [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = { 82, 5, 2, 0, 32767 }, +// [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 9, 2, 2500, 3700 }, +//};I don't think this comment style is allowed.This is a to-do item.quoted
quoted
+ +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg *bq27xxx_dm_regs[] = { + [BQ27421] = bq27421_dm_regs, /* and BQ27441 */ + [BQ27425] = bq27425_dm_regs, +// [BQ27621] = bq27621_dm_regs, +};I know it is not tested, but lets not comment it out, I'll do a round of testing for this part when this series is ready.ID for 621 is not yet defined. We need an efficient way to add IDs. Perhaps via chip-id and group-id. Most current ID refs would be to group-id. I'd like to defer that, so we should only add inputs for the single-chip groups in this patchset: 500, 545, 425. We must NOT set one-time program (OTP) memory, mentioned in 421 & 441 docs. It's not clear whether documented data-memory ops change OTP. Can you ask? The 425 has rewritable NVM. The 621 docs don't say. All the above have cfgupdate mode, which the rest of the family lacks.
This would be a good question for e2e[0]. [0] http://e2e.ti.com/support/power_management/battery_management/f/180