Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] power: bq27xxx_battery: Add power_supply_battery_info support
From: Liam Breck <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-27 20:06:21
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Andrew F. Davis [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/27/2017 01:11 AM, Liam Breck wrote:quoted
From: Liam Breck <redacted> Previously there was no way to configure chip registers in the event that the defaults didn't match the battery in question. BQ27xxx driver now calls power_supply_get_battery_info, checks the inputs, and writes battery data to chip RAM or non-volatile memory. Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <redacted> Signed-off-by: Liam Breck <redacted> --- drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c | 458 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 456 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c index 7475a5f..41d4ce7 100644 --- a/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c +++ b/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ #include <linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h> -#define DRIVER_VERSION "1.2.0" +#define DRIVER_VERSION "1.3.0" #define BQ27XXX_MANUFACTURER "Texas Instruments"@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_DSC BIT(0) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_SOCF BIT(1) /* State-of-Charge threshold final */ #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_SOC1 BIT(2) /* State-of-Charge threshold 1 */ +#define BQ27XXX_FLAG_CFGUP BIT(5) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_FC BIT(9) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD BIT(14) #define BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC BIT(15)@@ -72,6 +73,11 @@ #define BQ27000_FLAG_FC BIT(5) #define BQ27000_FLAG_CHGS BIT(7) /* Charge state flag */ +/* control register params */ +#define BQ27XXX_SEALED 0x20 +#define BQ27XXX_SET_CFGUPDATE 0x13 +#define BQ27XXX_SOFT_RESET 0x42 + #define BQ27XXX_RS (20) /* Resistor sense mOhm */ #define BQ27XXX_POWER_CONSTANT (29200) /* 29.2 µV^2 * 1000 */ #define BQ27XXX_CURRENT_CONSTANT (3570) /* 3.57 µV * 1000 */@@ -102,6 +108,11 @@ enum bq27xxx_reg_index { BQ27XXX_REG_SOC, /* State-of-Charge */ BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP, /* Design Capacity */ BQ27XXX_REG_AP, /* Average Power */ + BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL, /* BlockDataControl() *//* Block Data Control */quoted
+ BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS, /* DataClass() *//* Data Class */
I used the terms from the docs, so a search will find meaningful results.
quoted
+ BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK, /* DataBlock() */ + BQ27XXX_DM_DATA, /* BlockData() */ + BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM, /* BlockDataChecksum() */ BQ27XXX_REG_MAX, /* sentinel */ };@@ -125,6 +136,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x0b, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x76, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, }, [BQ27010] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -144,6 +160,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x0b, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x76, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, }, [BQ27500] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -163,6 +184,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27510] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -182,6 +208,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x20, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x2e, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27530] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -201,6 +232,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27541] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -220,6 +256,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27545] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -239,6 +280,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x2c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = INVALID_REG_ADDR, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x24, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27421] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -258,6 +304,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x1c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x18, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60, }, [BQ27425] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_CTRL] = 0x00,@@ -277,6 +328,11 @@ static u8 bq27xxx_regs[][BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { [BQ27XXX_REG_SOC] = 0x1c, [BQ27XXX_REG_DCAP] = 0x3c, [BQ27XXX_REG_AP] = 0x18, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CTRL] = 0x61, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CLASS] = 0x3e, + [BQ27XXX_DM_BLOCK] = 0x3f, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DATA] = 0x40, + [BQ27XXX_DM_CKSUM] = 0x60,That wasn't so painful was it :)
It added 11% to the patch :-/
quoted
}, };@@ -452,6 +508,81 @@ static struct { static DEFINE_MUTEX(bq27xxx_list_lock); static LIST_HEAD(bq27xxx_battery_devices); +#define BQ27XXX_DM_SZ 32 + +#define BQ27XXX_MSLEEP(i) usleep_range((i)*1000, (i)*1000+500) + +struct bq27xxx_dm_reg { + u8 subclass_id; + u8 offset; + u8 bytes; + u16 min, max; +}; + +struct bq27xxx_dm_buf { + u8 class; + u8 block; + u8 a[BQ27XXX_DM_SZ]; + bool full, updt; +}; + +#define BQ27XXX_DM_BUF(di, i) { \ + .class = bq27xxx_dm_regs[(di)->chip][i].subclass_id, \ + .block = bq27xxx_dm_regs[(di)->chip][i].offset / BQ27XXX_DM_SZ, \ +} + +static inline u16* bq27xxx_dm_buf_ptr(struct bq27xxx_dm_buf *buf, + struct bq27xxx_dm_reg *reg) { + if (buf->class == reg->subclass_id + && buf->block == reg->offset / BQ27XXX_DM_SZ) + return (u16*) (buf->a + reg->offset % BQ27XXX_DM_SZ); + + return NULL; +} + +enum bq27xxx_dm_reg_id { + BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY = 0, + BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY, + BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE, +}; + +static const char* bq27xxx_dm_reg_name[] = { + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = "design-capacity", + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = "design-energy", + [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = "terminate-voltage", +}; + +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27425_dm_regs[] = { + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = { 82, 12, 2, 0, 32767 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = { 82, 14, 2, 0, 32767 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 18, 2, 2800, 3700 }, +}; + +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27421_dm_regs[] = { /* not tested */ + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = { 82, 10, 2, 0, 8000 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = { 82, 12, 2, 0, 32767 }, + [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 16, 2, 2500, 3700 }, +}; + +//static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg bq27621_dm_regs[] = { /* not tested */ +// [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_CAPACITY] = { 82, 3, 2, 0, 8000 }, +// [BQ27XXX_DM_DESIGN_ENERGY] = { 82, 5, 2, 0, 32767 }, +// [BQ27XXX_DM_TERMINATE_VOLTAGE] = { 82, 9, 2, 2500, 3700 }, +//};I don't think this comment style is allowed.
This is a to-do item.
quoted
+ +static struct bq27xxx_dm_reg *bq27xxx_dm_regs[] = { + [BQ27421] = bq27421_dm_regs, /* and BQ27441 */ + [BQ27425] = bq27425_dm_regs, +// [BQ27621] = bq27621_dm_regs, +};I know it is not tested, but lets not comment it out, I'll do a round of testing for this part when this series is ready.
ID for 621 is not yet defined. We need an efficient way to add IDs. Perhaps via chip-id and group-id. Most current ID refs would be to group-id. I'd like to defer that, so we should only add inputs for the single-chip groups in this patchset: 500, 545, 425. We must NOT set one-time program (OTP) memory, mentioned in 421 & 441 docs. It's not clear whether documented data-memory ops change OTP. Can you ask? The 425 has rewritable NVM. The 621 docs don't say. All the above have cfgupdate mode, which the rest of the family lacks.