On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:18:55PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

Hi!

For everyone working on power management and runtime power management it
is important to have a meaningful information about the state of the
power domains. Current Exynos power domain driver created names of the
domains based on the device tree node name. Those name
we incorrectly a bit more descriptive (like "mfc-power-domain@10023C40"
in exynos4.dtsi) than they should be (it should be fixed to
"power-domain@10023C40"). This patch series adds reading human readable
names from the 'label' property. While touching this, I've also fixes
a few obvious issues related to power domain driver code.

Patches are based on the Linux next-20170130 branch.

Best regards
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

I think I am missing something... but it looks it does not work. I
applied it on top of my for-next tree and:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary 
domain                          status          slaves
    /device                                             runtime status
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    isp-power-domain@10023CA0       off-0           
    gps-alive-power-domain@10023D00  off-0           
    gps-power-domain@10023CE0       off-0           
    cam-power-domain@10023C00       off-0           

Also, with enabled debug on pm-domains and unbinding a device:
[  180.016800] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: genpd_runtime_resume()
[  180.017289] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: genpd_runtime_suspend()
[  180.017519] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: Removing 13400000.codec
[  180.024283] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: removing from PM domain mfc-power-domain@10023C40
[  180.024323] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: genpd_remove_device()

I think in both cases the genpd->name is used... which should be the new
name (label).

What is wrong?

Best regards,
Krzysztof