Re: [PATCH][v8] PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820 memory map by md5 value
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-31 11:07:36
Also in:
lkml
On Wed 2016-08-31 02:27:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 29, 2016 12:35:40 AM Chen Yu wrote:quoted
On some platforms, there is occasional panic triggered when trying to resume from hibernation, a typical panic looks like: "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff880085894000 IP: [<ffffffff810c5dc2>] load_image_lzo+0x8c2/0xe70" This is because e820 map has been changed by BIOS across hibernation, and one of the page frames from first kernel is right located in second kernel's unmapped region, so panic comes out when accessing unmapped kernel address. In order to expose this issue earlier, the md5 hash of e820 map is passed from suspend kernel to resume kernel, and the system will trigger panic once it finds the md5 value of previous kernel is not the same as current resume kernel. Note: 1. Without this patch applied, it is possible that BIOS has provided an inconsistent memory map, but the resume kernel is still able to restore the image anyway(e.g., E820_RAM region is the subset of the previous one), although the system might be unstable. So this patch tries to treat any inconsistent e820 as illegal. 2. Another case is, this patch replies on comparing the e820_saved, but currently the e820_save might not be strictly the same across hibernation, even if BIOS has provided consistent e820 map - In theory mptable might modify the BIOS-provided e820_saved dynamically in early_reserve_e820_mpc_new, which would allocate a buffer from E820_RAM, and marks it from E820_RAM to E820_RESERVED). This is a potential and rare case we need to deal with in OS in the future. Suggested-by: Pavel Machek <redacted> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted> Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> --- v8: - Panic the system once the e820 is found to be inconsistent during resume. Fix the md5 hash len from 128 bytes to 16 bytes. v7: - Use md5 hash to compare the e820 map. v6: - Fix some compiling errors reported by 0day/LKP, adjust Kconfig/variable namings. v5: - Rewrite this patch to just warn user of the broken BIOS when panic. v4: - Add __attribute__ ((unused)) for swsusp_page_is_valid, to eliminate the warnning of: 'swsusp_page_is_valid' defined but not used on non-x86 platforms. v3: - Adjust the logic to exclude the end_pfn boundary in pfn_mapped when invoking mark_valid_pages, because the end_pfn is not a mapped page frame, we should not regard it as a valid page. Move the sanity check of valid pages to a early stage in resuming process(moved to mark_unsafe_pages), in this way, we can avoid unnecessarily accessing these invalid pages in later stage(yes, move to the original position Joey once introduced in: Commit 84c91b7ae07c ("PM / hibernate: avoid unsafe pages in e820 reserved regions") With v3 patch applied, I did 30 cycles on my problematic platform, no panic triggered anymore(50% reproducible before patched, by plugging/unplugging memory peripheral during hibernation), and it just warns of invalid pages. v2: - According to Ingo's suggestion, rewrite this patch. New version just checks each page frame according to pfn_mapped array. So that we do not need to touch existing code related to E820_RESERVED_KERN. And this method can naturely guarantee that the system before/after hibernation do not need to be of the same memory size on x86_64. --- arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/power/Kconfig | 9 ++++ 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c b/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c index 9634557..7eb27afd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/power/hibernate_64.c@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ #include <linux/gfp.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/suspend.h> +#include <linux/scatterlist.h> +#include <linux/kdebug.h> + +#include <crypto/hash.h> #include <asm/init.h> #include <asm/proto.h>@@ -177,15 +181,100 @@ int pfn_is_nosave(unsigned long pfn) return (pfn >= nosave_begin_pfn) && (pfn < nosave_end_pfn); } +#define MD5_DIGEST_SIZE 16 + struct restore_data_record { unsigned long jump_address; unsigned long jump_address_phys; unsigned long cr3; unsigned long magic; + u8 e820_digest[MD5_DIGEST_SIZE]; }; #define RESTORE_MAGIC 0x123456789ABCDEF0ULYou're changing the image header format, so RESTORE_MAGIC needs to be updated too.
With !CONFIG_HIBERNATION_CHECK_E820, magic nothing changes in on-disk format. (Unused space is now used). If there's hibernation kernel is CONFIG_HIBERNATION_CHECK_E820, and restore kernel is !CONFIG_HIBERNATION_CHECK_E820, we won't check the E820, and that should be acceptable. If there's hibernation kernel is !CONFIG_HIBERNATION_CHECK_E820, and restore kernel is CONFIG_HIBERNATION_CHECK_E820, we'll fail the E820 check, and refuse to resume. That is also acceptable (and similar result we'd get with RESTORE_MAGIC).. but the message will be confusing. Ok, so I guess we should change the magic. Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html