Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-02-09 01:01:44
Also in:
lkml
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-02-09 01:01:44
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Steve Muckle [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Rafael, On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to put this series into linux-next. There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so there really isn't more time to wait.Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and really just got to look at this today. One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL task activity?
I don't think they may be completely stalled, but I'd prefer Peter to answer that as he suggested to do it this way. Peter?