Thread (68 messages) 68 messages, 4 authors, 2016-01-25

Re: [PATCH 17/17] cpufreq: dt: No need to allocate resources anymore

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2016-01-21 02:36:14

On 20-01-16, 17:18, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Yeah I don't understand why we at least can't populate the OPP
structures and get the clocks and regulators for all the CPU
devices before we register the dt_cpufreq_driver structure. The
CPU devices should exist at that point, and we can wait to do
CPUfreq transitions until the regulators/clocks for all the CPUs
are registered. Sure we'd need to find the OPPs that are being
shared in the cpufreq_init callback and populate the cpu
frequency tables, etc., but that's not a big deal.
We can do this, yes. But ->init() was really the right place to fix
that, we aren't able to do it properly because we lack a cpu processor
driver for ARM.
Making a CPU processor driver on ARM/non-ACPI systems would be to
solve the problem of all these random things like cpuidle-arm and
cpufreq-dt going through the list of cpu devices and hooking up
stuff to the cpuidle, cpufreq, and thermal frameworks. That's a
separate but related problem to probe defering the cpufreq-dt
driver.
Yeah, I wanted to work on that sometime :)

-- 
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help