Re: [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-01-20 18:44:21
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-01-20 18:44:21
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:46:48PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
+struct stats { + u64 sum; /* sum of values */ + u32 values[STATS_NR_VALUES]; /* array of values */ + unsigned char w_ptr; /* current window pointer */Why did you change this from an unsigned int? This won't provide any memory space saving given that the structure has to be padded up to the next 64-bit boundary.
Not to mention that loading bytes is more expensive on many archs compared to full words. Also, its not a pointer, its an index. So: unsigned int w_idx;