On 22/09/15 22:03, Lee Jones wrote:

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

On 22/09/15 00:20, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
the wakeup.

This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
enable_irq_wake instead.

Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
  drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c        | 11 +++++++++--
  drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c     |  2 +-
  drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c       | 15 +++++++++++----
  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
  drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c     |  6 ++++--
  drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c   |  6 ++++--
  drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c        |  9 ++++++---
  drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c |  5 ++---
  drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c | 10 ++++++----
  9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Is there a reason for bundling the changes in all of these subsystems
together into a single patch?

No, I understand this needs to be split. Since I was not 100% confident
about this change, I wanted LinusW to review and provide feedback and
gets things working before I can split this changes. I must have added
RFC, but usually it gets ignored :)

Best if Linus reviews the correct patch-set.  Please split and
resubmit.

Sure, but would like to get some feedback before I proceed just to
ensure my understanding is correct.

Regards,
Sudeep