Hi Chanwoo,

On 10/10/2014 01:38 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:

quoted

Since both SoCs have the same TMU IP block embedded on them, it is
not necessary to maintain separate compatible entry.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <redacted>
---
 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c

b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index f1e8c9b..7818e2f 100644

--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c

@@ -744,9 +744,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_tmu_irq(int irq, void

*id) 
 static const struct of_device_id exynos_tmu_match[] = {
 	{
-		.compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-tmu",
-	},
-	{

If you want to remove compatible string for Exynos3250,
you have to modify it on exynos3250.dtsi.

Thanks for pointing this out. I've overlooked this dtsi file.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi

-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group