Thread (77 messages) 77 messages, 7 authors, 2013-11-12

Re: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management

From: Arjan van de Ven <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-26 01:15:30
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On 9/25/2013 4:47 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
Also, the changelogs don't appear to discuss one obvious downside: the
latency incurred in bringing a bank out of one of the low-power states
and back into full operation.  Please do discuss and quantify that to
the best of your knowledge.
On Sandy Bridge the memry wakeup overhead is really small. It's on by default
in most setups today.
btw note that those kind of memory power savings are content-preserving,
so likely a whole chunk of these patches is not actually needed on SNB
(or anything else Intel sells or sold)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help