On 24 October 2012 06:03, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tuesday 23 of October 2012 10:55:51 Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

@Rafael: Most of these are due to mixed use of u64 and cputime64_t. Both of
which are u64 if i am not wrong. Any specific reason that we used cputime64_t
instead of u64? Or can i make everything u64 instead in governors?

Well, there might be a reason in the past, but I'm not sure it's still there. :-)

I _think_ you can use u64 everywhere.  It would be more correct than the current
situation anyway.

Great. I will send another set for these warnings..

--
viresh