Thread (133 messages) 133 messages, 19 authors, 2007-02-27

Re: cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]

From: Vitaly Wool <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-12 09:10:25
Also in: lkml

Pavel,

On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote:
Can we at least try adding that, before deciding cpufreq is unsuitable
and starting new interface? I do not think issues are nearly as big as
you think.. (at user<->kernel interface level, anyway; you'll need big
changes under the hood).
who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?!

Vitaly
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help