Re: cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]
From: Vitaly Wool <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-12 09:10:25
Also in:
lkml
From: Vitaly Wool <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-12 09:10:25
Also in:
lkml
Pavel, On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote:
Can we at least try adding that, before deciding cpufreq is unsuitable and starting new interface? I do not think issues are nearly as big as you think.. (at user<->kernel interface level, anyway; you'll need big changes under the hood).
who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?! Vitaly