On 2.02.2025 3:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 01/02/2025 16:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

quoted

On 27.01.2025 9:26 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 04:31:18AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

quoted

From: Konrad Dybcio <redacted>

(Almost?) all QMP PHYs come with both a "full reset" ("phy") and a
"retain certain registers" one ("phy_nocsr").

Drop the maxItems=1 constraint for resets and reset_names as we go
ahead and straighten out the DT usage. After that's done (which
will involve modifying some clock drivers etc.), we may set
*min*Items to 2, bar some possible exceptions.

You drop minItems now, so that's a bit confusing. If all devices have
two resets, just change in top-level resets the minItems -> 2 now and
mention that it does not affect the ABI, because Linux will support
missing reset and it describes the hardware more accurately.

This will generate a ton of warnings and resolving them may take an
additional cycle, as I'd need to get things merged through clk too,
so I thought this is a good transitional solution

I still don't understand why existing devices now get 1 reset, while
previously they had minItems:2.

Hm, right..

Would it make sense to just remove the else: branch?

Konrad

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy