Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] perf cs-etm: Add warnings for missing DSOs
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-06 18:36:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-06 18:36:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Em Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:59:49PM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
On 03/08/2021 15:01, Leo Yan wrote:quoted
quoted
one can also use debuginfod-client, which, as time passes, probably will be the main way of finding DSOs now that we have build-ids in PERF_RECORD_MMAP2 and debuginfod servers such as: export DEBUGINFOD_URLS=https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/If so, maybe should use more general description for missing DSO.quoted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Debuginfodquoted
With this improvement, the patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <redacted>Does this apply to the other 5 patches in this series?I finished to reivew patches 01, 04, 05, 06/06, so my review tag can apply on these patches. Current patch 06/06 needs James to improve for the comments.Thanks for the reviews, I've submitted v2. I also had a play around with debuginfod, it looks promising. Especially if it's integrated with perf report, which I assume is the plan?
Yeah, code is needed for that in the underlying symbols library so that we can tune its usage, i.e. the threshold of samples to trigger asking for the auto-download of debuginfo files. - Arnaldo