On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:24:46AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

I thought I had fixed up all instances where we can return -ENODEV; and all
others are indeed transport or transient error which should not result in a
namespace removal.

I think I was digging through the wrong tree. There is indeed no ENODEV
in nvme/nvme-5.12. Sorry about the noise.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <redacted>



_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme