Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-31

RE: [PATCH] nvme-tcp: proper handling of tcp socket closing flows

From: Grupi, Elad <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-31 15:47:32

Is it possible that we will have the following flow:

Thread 1 taking sk_callback_lock and goes into the switch case of sk_state, going to line:
	sock->sk->sk_user_data = queue;

at that point, thread 2 invokes sk_state_change, but this is still the original state_change callback because we didn't set yet to nvmet_tcp_state_change.

Thread 1 continues and set the callback to nvmet_tcp_state_change, but the state was already changed and nvmet_tcp_state_change will be never called.

I think this race still exist even when locked by sk_callback_lock.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> 
Sent: Friday, 29 January 2021 1:34
To: Grupi, Elad; linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-tcp: proper handling of tcp socket closing flows


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

That will work if sk_state_change is called under sk_callback_lock.
It is.
In addition, need to flush_work(&queue->port->accept_work) in nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work because accept_work is still using queue struct after unlocking sk_callback_lock.

But sk->sk_user_data was not set, so I don't see how the release work can invoke.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
What about this instead?
--
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c 
index c41902f7ce39..6388d18ca7c2 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
@@ -1494,16 +1494,28 @@ static int nvmet_tcp_set_queue_sock(struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue)
                  ip_sock_set_tos(sock->sk, inet->rcv_tos);

          write_lock_bh(&sock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
-       sock->sk->sk_user_data = queue;
-       queue->data_ready = sock->sk->sk_data_ready;
-       sock->sk->sk_data_ready = nvmet_tcp_data_ready;
-       queue->state_change = sock->sk->sk_state_change;
-       sock->sk->sk_state_change = nvmet_tcp_state_change;
-       queue->write_space = sock->sk->sk_write_space;
-       sock->sk->sk_write_space = nvmet_tcp_write_space;
+       switch (sk->sk_state) {
+       case TCP_FIN_WAIT1:
+       case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
+       case TCP_CLOSE:
+               /*
+                * If the socket is already closing, don't even start
+                * consuming it
+                */
+               ret = -ENOTCONN;
+               break;
+       default:
+               sock->sk->sk_user_data = queue;
+               queue->data_ready = sock->sk->sk_data_ready;
+               sock->sk->sk_data_ready = nvmet_tcp_data_ready;
+               queue->state_change = sock->sk->sk_state_change;
+               sock->sk->sk_state_change = nvmet_tcp_state_change;
+               queue->write_space = sock->sk->sk_write_space;
+               sock->sk->sk_write_space = nvmet_tcp_write_space;
+       }
          write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk->sk_callback_lock);

-       return 0;
+       return ret;
   }
--
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help