Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] nvme: retry commands based on ACRE flag
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2021-01-18 17:41:16
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:26:02AM +0900, Minwoo Im wrote:
quoted
I am not sure we should ignore the FAILFAST for non-path errors. If we need retryable admin commands, we should let the driver provide a way for callers to dispatch requests without that flag.Understood. I thought the opposite way about FAILFAST in case with acre, if device is enabled with acre, all commands would be retried regardless to FAILFAST... Thanks for pointing that out! How do you think which one is right choice to go with if a user-space application(e.g., nvme-cli) wants a command to be retired in case of ACRE && Error && !DNR: - User-space application should figure out !DNR and retry the command. (Maybe we are not able to easily figure out exact status code from the user-space application by the return value). - Driver should retry the command right before putting result up to the user-space even it's a FAILFAST request. Thanks,
We could come up with a version of the ioctls that use the normal retry mechanisms. nvme_passthru_cmd64 has two reserved fields we could use for UAPI flags like this. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme