Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Improve observability in svc_tcp_accept()
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-05-15 16:55:15
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 09:32 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> The -ENOMEM arm could fire repeatedly if the system runs low on memory, so remove it. Don't bother to trace -EAGAIN error events, since those fire after a listener is created (with no work done) and once again after an accept has been handled successfully (again, with no work done). Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> --- net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c index e0fb65e90af2..2058641ab9f6 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c@@ -885,13 +885,8 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_tcp_accept(struct svc_xprt *xprt) clear_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags); err = kernel_accept(sock, &newsock, O_NONBLOCK); if (err < 0) { - if (err == -ENOMEM) - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: no more sockets!\n", - serv->sv_name); - else if (err != -EAGAIN) - net_warn_ratelimited("%s: accept failed (err %d)!\n", - serv->sv_name, -err); - trace_svcsock_accept_err(xprt, serv->sv_name, err); + if (err != -EAGAIN) + trace_svcsock_accept_err(xprt, serv->sv_name, err);
Would this be better done as a TP_CONDITION tracepoint?
return NULL; } set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
-- Jeff Layton [off-list ref]