On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:

On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

quoted

* KOSAKI Motohiro [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

Index: b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
===================================================================

--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 *     David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
 */

-#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <asm/types.h>

No , we do not even need asm/types.h

Subject: [PATCH] Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is not required
for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <redacted>

ok. I confirmed.
	Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro [off-list ref]
	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro [off-list ref]

Thanks.

Jaswinder, mind adding these tags to the commit and sending a pull request 
with all fixes?

The following changes since commit 0b86a4e34d885e734a4c4e46293376f3f1c639eb:
  Ingo Molnar (1):
        Merge branch 'core/header-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/.../jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip into core/header-fixes

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git core/header-fixes

Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
      Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
      make linux/types.h as assembly safe

I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.