On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Russell King - ARM Linux [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:

quoted

Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
      Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
      make linux/types.h as assembly safe

I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.

But have not replied to my mail about that so far.

Sigh.  No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and
covered all points in _that_ reply.

Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To:
header?

Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.