RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 08/61] fuse: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
From: Loktionov, Aleksandr <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-11 08:18:34
Also in:
amd-gfx, bpf, ceph-devel, cocci, dm-devel, dri-devel, gfs2, intel-gfx, intel-wired-lan, kvm, linux-block, linux-bluetooth, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-clk, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-gpio, linux-hyperv, linux-input, linux-iommu, linux-leds, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-nfs, linux-omap, linux-phy, linux-pm, linux-rockchip, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linux-sctp, linux-security-module, linux-sh, linux-sound, linux-trace-kernel, linux-usb, linux-wireless, lkml, netdev, ntfs3, sched-ext, target-devel, v9fs
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-wired-lan <redacted> On Behalf
Of Philipp Hahn
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 12:49 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com;
bpf@vger.kernel.org; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; cocci@inria.fr; dm-
devel@lists.linux.dev; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
gfs2@lists.linux.dev; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-wired-
lan@lists.osuosl.org; iommu@lists.linux.dev; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org;
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-
cifs@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-
erofs@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-
fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; linux-
hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-leds@vger.kernel.org; linux-
media@vger.kernel.org; linux-mips@vger.kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org;
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-
nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-
phy@lists.infradead.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
rockchip@lists.infradead.org; linux-s390@vger.kernel.org; linux-
scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org; linux-security-
module@vger.kernel.org; linux-sh@vger.kernel.org; linux-
sound@vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com;
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-
wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
ntfs3@lists.linux.dev; samba-technical@lists.samba.org; sched-
ext@lists.linux.dev; target-devel@vger.kernel.org; tipc-
discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; v9fs@lists.linux.dev; Philipp Hahn
[off-list ref]
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 08/61] fuse: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL
over manual NULL check
Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
check.
Change generated with coccinelle.
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <redacted>
---
fs/fuse/dir.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c index
7ac6b232ef12323e3afb97b98301f623bce917a4..7b39c013027bd9c4ba6f080bfc9b
3ec22bc2dd4a 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ int fuse_reverse_inval_entry(struct fuse_conn
*fc, u64 parent_nodeid,
goto put_parent;
while (!entry) {
struct dentry *child = try_lookup_noperm(name, dir);
- if (!child || IS_ERR(child))
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(child))
goto put_parent;
entry = start_removing_dentry(dir, child);
dput(child);
--
2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <redacted>