On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:43:17PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:20:41PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
quoted
Hi Luis,
As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split
optional code out of core module support code into separate components.
This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or
modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts.
Changes since v1 [2]:
Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix,
rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my
modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again?
I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to
rebase on top of that.
Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next.
Sounds like a good idea. When rebasing on top of 5.17-rc1 the only
conflict was on the module code.
I'll let you know once modules-next is ready for your code. But before
that, does anyone have any objections with this code going through
modules-next? Although its kexec related it touches on a lot of
kernel/module.c and if we don't take it on modules-next I'm afraid
there will be quite a bit of conflicts there later.
Luis