Hello,

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:20:41PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:

quoted

Hi Luis,

As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split
optional code out of core module support code into separate components.
This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or
modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts.

Changes since v1 [2]:

Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix,
rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my
modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again?

I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to
rebase on top of that.

Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next.

Sounds like a good idea. When rebasing on top of 5.17-rc1 the only
conflict was on the module code.

Thanks

Michal