Re: Drop support to compressed modules?

On Friday 2012-09-21 23:41, Lucas De Marchi wrote:

While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that
already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about these
questions. Dave made a couple of benchmarks and performance wise it's
better to use uncompressed modules than modules with gz or xz
compression. However the benchmark was done in only 1 computer. I do
expect people with slow storage to have different numbers though. Does
anyone have these numbers?

What benchmark should be run?