Hey,
I'd like to ask people the following question: why are you using
compressed modules? Is it only for the disk space or is there any
performance related reason?
While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that
already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about these
questions. Dave made a couple of benchmarks and performance wise it's
better to use uncompressed modules than modules with gz or xz
compression. However the benchmark was done in only 1 computer. I do
expect people with slow storage to have different numbers though. Does
anyone have these numbers?
About the bug, I think it's fixed in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-modules/msg00846.html. Need to test
a bit more before rolling out a new release.
Regards,
Lucas De Marchi