Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 8 authors, 2021-08-25

Re: [PATCH 2/5] slab: Add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2021-08-18 06:31:02
Also in: linux-hardening, linux-kbuild, lkml

On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 23:16 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:31:32PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 22:08 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
As already done in GrapheneOS, add the __alloc_size attribute for
regular kmalloc interfaces, to provide additional hinting for better
bounds checking, assisting CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE and other compiler
optimizations.
[]
quoted
Lastly __alloc_size should probably be added to checkpatch
Oh, yes! Thanks for the reminder.
quoted
Maybe:
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 161ce7fe5d1e5..1a166b5cf3447 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -489,7 +489,8 @@ our $Attribute	= qr{
 			____cacheline_aligned|
 			____cacheline_aligned_in_smp|
 			____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp|
-			__weak
+			__weak|
+			__alloc_size\s*\(\s*\d+\s*(?:,\s*d+\s*){0,5}\)
Why the "{0,5}" bit here? I was expecting just "?". (i.e. it can have
either 1 or 2 arguments.)
You are right.  I misread the doc.  I also missed a \ before the last d.

So that last added line should maybe be: (totally untested btw)

+			__alloc_size\s*\(\s*\d+\s*(?:,\s*\d+\s*)?\)

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help