Re: [PATCH 5/8] membarrier, kthread: Use _ONCE accessors for task->mm
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-06-16 04:29:02
Also in:
lkml
Excerpts from Andy Lutomirski's message of June 16, 2021 1:21 pm:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
membarrier reads cpu_rq(remote cpu)->curr->mm without locking. Use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() to remove the data races. Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> --- fs/exec.c | 2 +- kernel/kthread.c | 4 ++-- kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 18594f11c31f..2e63dea83411 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) local_irq_disable(); active_mm = tsk->active_mm; tsk->active_mm = mm; - tsk->mm = mm; + WRITE_ONCE(tsk->mm, mm); /* membarrier reads this without locks */ /* * This prevents preemption while active_mm is being loaded and * it and mm are being updated, which could cause problems fordiff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c index 8275b415acec..4962794e02d5 100644 --- a/kernel/kthread.c +++ b/kernel/kthread.c@@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ void kthread_use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) mmgrab(mm); tsk->active_mm = mm; } - tsk->mm = mm; + WRITE_ONCE(tsk->mm, mm); /* membarrier reads this without locks */ membarrier_update_current_mm(mm); switch_mm_irqs_off(active_mm, mm, tsk); membarrier_finish_switch_mm(atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state));@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ void kthread_unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) smp_mb__after_spinlock(); sync_mm_rss(mm); local_irq_disable(); - tsk->mm = NULL; + WRITE_ONCE(tsk->mm, NULL); /* membarrier reads this without locks */ membarrier_update_current_mm(NULL); /* active_mm is still 'mm' */ enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c index 3173b063d358..c32c32a2441e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c +++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id) goto out; rcu_read_lock(); p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu_id)->curr); - if (!p || p->mm != mm) { + if (!p || READ_ONCE(p->mm) != mm) { rcu_read_unlock(); goto out; }@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id) struct task_struct *p; p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr); - if (p && p->mm == mm) + if (p && READ_ONCE(p->mm) == mm)
/* exec, kthread_use_mm write this without locks */ ? Seems good to me. Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask); } rcu_read_unlock();@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int sync_runqueues_membarrier_state(struct mm_struct *mm) struct task_struct *p; p = rcu_dereference(rq->curr); - if (p && p->mm == mm) + if (p && READ_ONCE(p->mm) == mm) __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask); } rcu_read_unlock();-- 2.31.1