Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2021-02-02

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] uacce: Add uacce_ctrl misc device

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Date: 2021-01-26 10:26:18
Also in: linux-iommu, lkml

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:35:22PM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:21:14PM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
quoted
mlock, while certainly be able to prevent swapping out, it won't
be able to stop page moving due to:
* memory compaction in alloc_pages()
* making huge pages
* numa balance
* memory compaction in CMA
Enabling those things is a major reason to have SVA device in the
first place, providing a SW API to turn it all off seems like the
wrong direction.
I wouldn't say this is a major reason to have SVA. If we read the
history of SVA and papers, people would think easy programming due
to data struct sharing between cpu and device, and process space
isolation in device would be the major reasons for SVA. SVA also
declares it supports zero-copy while zero-copy doesn't necessarily
depend on SVA.
Once you have to explicitly make system calls to declare memory under
IO, you loose all of that.

Since you've asked the app to be explicit about the DMAs it intends to
do, there is not really much reason to use SVA for those DMAs anymore.

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help