Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: convert page_huge_active() to HPageMigratable flag
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Date: 2021-01-15 09:18:43
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:01:51PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Use the new hugetlb page specific flag to replace the page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really what code checking the flag wanted to know. It really wanted to determine if the huge page could be migrated. This happens when the page is actually added the page cache and/or task page table. This is the reasoning behind the name change. The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() calls in the interfaces were not really necessary as in all case but one we KNOW the page is a hugetlb page. Therefore, they are removed. In one call to HPageMigratable() is it possible for the page to not be a hugetlb page due to a race. However, the code making the call (scan_movable_pages) is inherently racy, and page state will be validated later in the migration process. Note: Since HPageMigratable is used outside hugetlb.c, it can not be static. Therefore, a new set of hugetlb page flag macros is added for non-static flag functions.
Two things about this one: I am not sure about the name of this one. It is true that page_huge_active() was only called by memory-hotplug and all it wanted to know was whether the page was in-use and so if it made sense to migrate it, so I see some value in the new PageMigratable flag. However, not all in-use hugetlb can be migrated, e.g: we might have constraints when it comes to migrate certain sizes of hugetlb, right? So setting HPageMigratable to all active hugetlb pages might be a bit misleading? HPageActive maybe? (Sorry, don't have a replacement) The other thing is that you are right that scan_movable_pages is racy, but page_huge_active() was checking if the page had the Head flag set before retrieving page[1]. Before the page_huge_active() in scan_movable_pages() we have the if (!PageHuge(page)) check, but could it be that between that check and the page_huge_active(), the page gets dissolved, and so we are checking a wrong page[1]? Am I making sense? -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3