Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 9 authors, 2017-02-10

Re: mm: deadlock between get_online_cpus/pcpu_alloc

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-02-08 12:23:40
Also in: lkml

On Wed 08-02-17 13:02:07, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
quoted
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207201950.20482-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Well, yes. It's simple, but from an RT point of view I really don't like
it as we have to fix it up again.
I thought that preempt_disable would turn into migrate_disable or
something like that which shouldn't cause too much trouble. Or am I
missing something? Which part of the patch is so RT unfriendly?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help