On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:14:02PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

On 11/22/2016 05:06 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:56:39PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:50:20PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

quoted

quoted

4.9rc5 however seems to be doing better, and is still running after 18
hours. However, I got a few page allocation failures as per below, but the
system seems to recover.
Vlastimil, do you want me to continue the copy on 4.9 (may take 3-5 days) 
or is that good enough, and i should go back to 4.8.8 with that patch applied?
https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=147423605024993

Hi, I think it's enough for 4.9 for now and I would appreciate trying
4.8 with that patch, yeah.

So the good news is that it's been running for almost 5H and so far so good.

And the better news is that the copy is still going strong, 4.4TB and
going. So 4.8.8 is fixed with that one single patch as far as I'm
concerned.

So thanks for that, looks good to me to merge.

Thanks a lot for the testing. So what do we do now about 4.8? (4.7 is
already EOL AFAICS).

- send the patch [1] as 4.8-only stable. Greg won't like that, I expect.
  - alternatively a simpler (againm 4.8-only) patch that just outright
prevents OOM for 0 < order < costly, as Michal already suggested.
- backport 10+ compaction patches to 4.8 stable
- something else?

Just wait for 4.8-stable to go end-of-life in a few weeks after 4.9 is
released?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>