Re: [RFC 1/8] mm: Define coherent device memory node
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-24 17:09:35
Also in:
lkml
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-24 17:09:35
Also in:
lkml
+#ifdef CONFIG_COHERENT_DEVICE +#define node_cdm(nid) (NODE_DATA(nid)->coherent_device) +#define set_cdm_isolation(nid) (node_cdm(nid) = 1) +#define clr_cdm_isolation(nid) (node_cdm(nid) = 0) +#define isolated_cdm_node(nid) (node_cdm(nid) == 1) +#else +#define set_cdm_isolation(nid) () +#define clr_cdm_isolation(nid) () +#define isolated_cdm_node(nid) (0) +#endif
FWIW, I think adding all this "cdm" gunk in the names is probably a bad thing. I can think of other memory types that are coherent, but non-device-based that might want behavior like this. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>