Re: More OOM problems (sorry fro the mail bomb)
From: Raymond Jennings <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-30 19:48:57
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Vlastimil Babka [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/29/2016 10:08 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:quoted
Suggestion: 1. Make it a background process "kcompactd" 2. It is activated/woke up/semaphored awake any time a page is freed. 3. Once it is activated, it enters a loop: 3.1. Reset the semaphore. 3.2. Once a cycle, it takes the highest movable page 3.3. It then finds the lowest free page 3.4. Then, it migrates the highest used page to the lowest free space 3.5. maybe pace itself by sleeping for a teensy, then go back to step 3.2 3.6. Do one page at a time to keep it neatly interruptible and keep it from blocking other stuff. Since compaction is a housekeeping task, it should probably be eager to yield to other things. 3.7. Probably leave hugepages alone if detected since they are by definition fairly defragmented already. 4. Once all gaps are backfilled, go back to sleep and park back at step 2 waiting for the next wakeup. Would this be a good way to do it?Yes, that's pretty much how it already works, except movable pages are taken from low pfn and free pages from high. Then there's ton of subtle issues to tackle, mostly the balance between overhead and benefit.
Besides the kswapd hook, what would nudge kcompactd to run? If its not proactively nudged after a page is freed how will it know that there's fragmentation that could be taken care of in advance before being shoved by kswapd? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>