Re: More OOM problems
From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-26 07:48:10
On Sun 25-09-16 22:48:23, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:53:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
On Mon 19-09-16 09:42:37, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:32:15AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
so this is the same thing as in Linus case. All the zones are hitting min wmark so the should_compact_retry() gave up. As mentioned in other email [1] this is inherent limitation of the workaround. Your system is swapless but there is a lot of the reclaimable page cache so Vlastimil's patches should help.I will experiment with a linux-next kernel and see if the problem recurs. I've attempted to see if there is a way to manually reproduce on the mainline kernel by performing workloads that triggered the OOM (loading google sheets tabs, compiling a kernel, playing a video on youtube), but to no avail - it seems the system needs to be sufficiently fragmented first before it'll trigger. Given that's the case, I'll just have to try using the linux-next kernel and if you don't hear from me you can assume it did not repro again :)OK, fair deal ;)Actually, I'll break the deal :) I've been running workloads similar to previous weeks when I encountered the issue - including kernel builds, video playing, lotsa tabs, etc. and also tried to intentionally eat up a bit of RAM from time-to-time and have not seen a single OOM, so it looks like this is sorted it for my system, notwithstanding Murphy's law.
Thanks for the feedback. Your testing is highly appreciated! I guess Andrew can put your Tested-by for the latest Vlastimil patches to credit your effort. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>