On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:46:05 +0100 Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and
it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into
mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you
consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series?

In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a
tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for
your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the
whole series.

Anyone for a tie breaker?

I am aggressively undecided.  I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49
situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the
balance toward the legacy names?

I still can't decide. It's currently still a draw in terms of naming. If
you're worried, use the old naming. It wouldn't be the first time I
thought a name was odd.

Well I dunno.  We can leave the series as-is for now and we can merge
the rename-it-back patch sometime during the next -rc cycle if we find
that people are running around in confusion and tumbling out of high
windows.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>