Re: [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-23 10:58:59
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 04:04:34PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
quoted
-static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc) +static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc, + enum zone_type classzone_idx) { struct zoneref *z; struct zone *zone; unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed; unsigned long nr_soft_scanned; gfp_t orig_mask; - enum zone_type requested_highidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask); /* * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum@@ -2560,15 +2579,20 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist, gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {Using sc->reclaim_idx could be faster/nicer here than gfp_zone()?
Yes, then the reclaim_idx and classzone_idx needs to be updated if buffer_heads_over_limit in the check above but that is better anyway.
Although after "mm, vmscan: Update classzone_idx if buffer_heads_over_limit" there would need to be a variable for the highmem adjusted value - maybe reuse "requested_highidx"? Not important though.
I think it's ok in the buffer_heads_over_limit case to reclaim from more zones than requested. It may require another pass through do_try_to_free_pages if a low zone was not reclaimed and required by the caller but that's ok and expected if there are too many buffer_heads.
quoted
- enum zone_type classzone_idx; - if (!populated_zone(zone)) continue; - classzone_idx = requested_highidx; + /* + * Note that reclaim_idx does not change as it is the highest + * zone reclaimed from which for empty zones is a no-op but + * classzone_idx is used by shrink_node to test if the slabs + * should be shrunk on a given node. + */ while (!populated_zone(zone->zone_pgdat->node_zones + - classzone_idx)) + classzone_idx)) { classzone_idx--; + continue; + } /* * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence@@ -2594,8 +2618,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)*/ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER && - zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= requested_highidx && - compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, requested_highidx)) { + zonelist_zone_idx(z) <= classzone_idx && + compaction_ready(zone, sc->order, classzone_idx)) { sc->compaction_ready = true; continue; }@@ -2615,7 +2639,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */ } - shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx); + shrink_node(zone->zone_pgdat, sc, classzone_idx); } /*@@ -2647,6 +2671,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,int initial_priority = sc->priority; unsigned long total_scanned = 0; unsigned long writeback_threshold; + enum zone_type classzone_idx = sc->reclaim_idx;Hmm, try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() seems to call this with sc->reclaim_idx not explicitly inirialized (e.g. 0). And shrink_all_memory() as well. I probably didn't check them in v6 and pointed out only try_to_free_pages() (which is now OK), sorry.
That gets fixed in "mm, memcg: move memcg limit enforcement from zones to nodes" but I can move the hunk to this patch to make bisection a little easier.
quoted
retry: delayacct_freepages_start();@@ -2657,7 +2682,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,vmpressure_prio(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, sc->priority); sc->nr_scanned = 0; - shrink_zones(zonelist, sc); + shrink_zones(zonelist, sc, classzone_idx);Looks like classzone_idx here is only used here to pass to shrink_zones() unchanged, which means it can just use it directly without a new param?
Yes -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>