Hello,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:

__init_kthread_worker()		-> __kthread_init_worker()
init_kthread_worker()		-> kthread_init_worker()
init_kthread_work()		-> kthread_init_work()
insert_kthread_work()		-> kthread_insert_work()
queue_kthread_work()		-> kthread_queue_work()
flush_kthread_work()		-> kthread_flush_work()
flush_kthread_worker()		-> kthread_flush_worker()

I wonder whether the subsystem name here is more the whole
kthread_worker rather than just kthread but I can't think of a good
single syllable abbrev for it.  It's a bikeshedding anyway.

Note that the names of DEFINE_KTHREAD_WORK*() macros stay
as they are. It is common that the "DEFINE_" prefix has
precedence over the subsystem names.

INIT_() macros are similar to DEFINE_. Therefore this patch
renames:

KTHREAD_WORKER_INIT()		-> INIT_KTHREAD_WORKER()
KTHREAD_WORK_INIT()		-> INIT_KTHREAD_WORK()

So, they're different.  In the above cases, INIT doesn't stand for the
verb INITIALIZE but its noun form INITIALIZER.  These aren't
operations and thus different from DEFINE_XXX().

	kthread_init_worker	= kthread: initialize worker
	KTHREAD_WORKER_INIT	= kthread: worker initializer

I think it makes a lot more sense to keep _INIT at the end for these.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>