Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: base LRU balancing on an explicit cost model
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2016-06-08 16:06:14
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:14:21PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:48:33PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:quoted
@@ -249,15 +249,10 @@ void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page) } } -static void update_page_reclaim_stat(struct lruvec *lruvec, - int file, int rotated, - unsigned int nr_pages) +void lru_note_cost(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file, unsigned int nr_pages) { - struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat; - - reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_pages; - if (rotated) - reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file] += nr_pages; + lruvec->balance.numer[file] += nr_pages; + lruvec->balance.denom += nr_pages;balance.numer[0] + balance.number[1] = balance.denom so we can remove denom at the moment?
You're right, it doesn't make sense to keep that around anymore. I'll remove it. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>